Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:33
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Season ends for Husker baseball with historic loss to Oklahoma - KETV
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
How do you fight the push and pull (manipulation) tactic if you want to win him?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Jets owner Woody Johnson buying Crystal Palace with $254 million investment - New York Post
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Dakota Johnson Is “Always Psyched” To Film Sex Scenes - The Cut
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Steven Spielberg will introduce a ‘Jaws’ 50th anniversary special - CNN
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Private-sector firms added just 37,000 jobs in May, the lowest total in more than two years - CNN
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.